Practical-Man’s, or Blind-Horse’s, or Thought-Condemner’s, or Reason-Abjurer’s, Argument--No Theories! No Speculation! No Utopianism! No Metaphysics
dc.contributor.author | Bentham, Jeremy | |
dc.contributor.editor | Schofield, Philip | |
dc.coverage.spatial | Oxford, england | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-09-17T12:57:56Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-09-17T12:57:56Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
dc.format.extent | 204-212 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Bentham, Jeremy. “Practical-Man’s, or Blind-Horse’s, or Thought-Condemner’s, or Reason-Abjurer’s, Argument--No Theories! No Speculation! No Utopianism! No Metaphysics. In his The Book of Fallacies. Ed. Philip Schofield (Oxford, eng.: Oxford University Press 2015), 204-212. | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://cetapsrepository.letras.up.pt/id/cetaps/126879 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.publisher | Oxford University Press | |
dc.relation.ispartof | The Book of Fallacies | |
dc.title | Practical-Man’s, or Blind-Horse’s, or Thought-Condemner’s, or Reason-Abjurer’s, Argument--No Theories! No Speculation! No Utopianism! No Metaphysics | |
dc.type | Book chapter |