Practical-Man’s, or Blind-Horse’s, or Thought-Condemner’s, or Reason-Abjurer’s, Argument--No Theories! No Speculation! No Utopianism! No Metaphysics

dc.contributor.authorBentham, Jeremy
dc.contributor.editorSchofield, Philip
dc.coverage.spatialOxford, england
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-17T12:57:56Z
dc.date.available2024-09-17T12:57:56Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.format.extent204-212
dc.identifier.citationBentham, Jeremy. “Practical-Man’s, or Blind-Horse’s, or Thought-Condemner’s, or Reason-Abjurer’s, Argument--No Theories! No Speculation! No Utopianism! No Metaphysics. In his The Book of Fallacies. Ed. Philip Schofield (Oxford, eng.: Oxford University Press 2015), 204-212.
dc.identifier.urihttps://cetapsrepository.letras.up.pt/id/cetaps/126879
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherOxford University Press
dc.relation.ispartofThe Book of Fallacies
dc.titlePractical-Man’s, or Blind-Horse’s, or Thought-Condemner’s, or Reason-Abjurer’s, Argument--No Theories! No Speculation! No Utopianism! No Metaphysics
dc.typeBook chapter

Files